<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unit Testing Fundamentals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rapaul.com/2009/03/02/unit-testing-fundamentals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rapaul.com/2009/03/02/unit-testing-fundamentals/</link>
	<description>A technical blog written by Richard Paul</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:53:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.rapaul.com/2009/03/02/unit-testing-fundamentals/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapaul.com/?p=182#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Here are a couple more links on the subject (thanks Rob)

SOLID (object oriented design):
http://butunclebob.com/ArticleS.UncleBob.PrinciplesOfOod

FIRST (unit testing best practices):
http://agileinaflash.blogspot.com/2009/02/first.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are a couple more links on the subject (thanks Rob)</p>
<p>SOLID (object oriented design):<br />
<a href="http://butunclebob.com/ArticleS.UncleBob.PrinciplesOfOod" rel="nofollow">http://butunclebob.com/ArticleS.UncleBob.PrinciplesOfOod</a></p>
<p>FIRST (unit testing best practices):<br />
<a href="http://agileinaflash.blogspot.com/2009/02/first.html" rel="nofollow">http://agileinaflash.blogspot.com/2009/02/first.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.rapaul.com/2009/03/02/unit-testing-fundamentals/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapaul.com/?p=182#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Lior.  I had heard of Typemock, but not of PowerMock.  I like the idea that code remains loosely coupled when a seam is exposed, but now that I know about PowerMock I&#039;ll have a play with it and see how it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Lior.  I had heard of Typemock, but not of PowerMock.  I like the idea that code remains loosely coupled when a seam is exposed, but now that I know about PowerMock I&#8217;ll have a play with it and see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lior</title>
		<link>http://www.rapaul.com/2009/03/02/unit-testing-fundamentals/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Lior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapaul.com/?p=182#comment-37</guid>
		<description>You do realize that Typemock will allow you to achieve the same things without the need to &quot;Expose a Seam&quot;, or more specifically static are a seam like any other method (the same holds when using the Java PowerMock tool)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do realize that Typemock will allow you to achieve the same things without the need to &#8220;Expose a Seam&#8221;, or more specifically static are a seam like any other method (the same holds when using the Java PowerMock tool)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
